And then I made a secondary, equally important breakthrough:
Blog Epilogue: Josh wants everyone to know that "awesomeness" cannot be a numerical constant, but rather an abstract objective. This is how he explains that, though I am equal to or greater than awesome, the awesomeness that is created as a combination of us does not mean that he is less than or equal to awesome. I don't argue. The man washes my dishes and feeds me, so he can believe anything he would like about his awesomeness quotient.
4 comments:
So how are you going to break it to Josh that he has to be <= awesome?
:)
You are too funny. I love it.
I'm a little more curious about your attire -- it looks like you broke free from a live nativity, prudently grabbed an insulated vest and then started posing on the beach. Explain!
I HAD THE EXACT SAME THOUGHT AS MHANA. Well mine was a little more like "That looks like an outfit we would stick primary kids in to portray Lehi...except the vest..."
Post a Comment